
Bulletin No. 36
September 8, 1997
Ozone Generators - Warning - Not For Occupied Spaces
Not all indoor air cleaning devices are alike, and certain types could cause health
problems. Machines that purposefully produce ozone as an indoor air cleansing agent are currently on the market for
residential use - these products should be avoided.
Ozone is a potent lung irritant that can cause respiratory distress, and levels of
ozone that clean air effectively are unsafe to human health. The Alaska Division of Public Health is warning
Alaskans not to use ozone generating devices in occupied spaces such as vehicles or residential homes. While some
of these machines have valuable commercial applications such as the removal of odors from unoccupied buildings,
ozone generators should not be used when people, animals or plants are present.
Ozone (also referred to as trivalent oxygen or saturated oxygen) is a
powerful oxidizing agent. Long term exposure to high levels of ozone may result in permanent lung damage. Exposure
to ozone can also result in cough and chest pain on deep inhalation, eye, throat and nose irritation, and increased
sensitivity to airborne allergens and irritants. While ozone is a necessary part of the upper atmosphere, ozone is
a principle component of smog in the lower atmosphere that we breathe. Ozone can also react with volatile organic
compounds in the air to produce harmful byproducts such as formaldehyde. Ozone is produced indirectly by ion
generators and some other electronic air cleaners, and directly by ozone generators.
The elderly, families with children, and people with respiratory diseases such as
asthma are the most susceptible to the toxic effects of ozone, and are among those most likely to be interested in
using an indoor air cleaner. The American Lung Association recommends that people seeking cleaner indoor air avoid
ozone generating devices. Consumers should determine whether any electronic air cleaner they are considering for
purchase has been tested for ozone production. Filters or electrostatic precipitators may be safer methods with
which to clean indoor air, and are more effective alternatives than ozone generating devices.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration prohibits devices that result
in more than 50 parts per billion (ppb) of ozone in the air of occupied enclosed spaces such as homes, offices or
vehicles, or that result in any releases of ozone in places occupied by the ill or infirm. Independent testing by
Consumers Reports in 1992 revealed that two brands of air cleaners using ionizer/ozone generator technology under a
variety of conditions frequently produced ozone levels above the FDA’s limit of 50 ppb. The levels of ozone
generated by a device are influenced by many factors such as the power setting,room size and ventilation rate, and
are not easily controlled by the individual consumer.
Although personal or residential ozone generating machines are promoted as air
cleaners, independent studies have shown that the machines do not effectively destroy microbes, remove odor sources
or reduce indoor pollutants sufficiently to provide any health benefits(2-4). Levels of ozone below the FDA’s limit
of 50 ppb are not sufficient to function as effective air cleaning devices. Commercial ozone generating devices are
useful for some applications such as the clearing of smoke and other odors from contaminated buildings. However,
high levels of ozone are used during these commercial applications, and spaces must be unoccupied at the time of
treatment.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has recently taken action against
some manufacturers of ozone generating machines to prohibit them from making unsupported claims about the ability
of the machines to clean air or to provide health-related benefits. In its complaint, the FTC named Living Air
Corporation, Alpine Industries, Inc., Quantum Electronics Corp., and the officers of those companies. Also, the
State of Minnesota recently prevailed in a lawsuit against Alpine Air Products, Inc. The Minnesota District Court
found that the company had violated Minnesota consumer fraud and antitrust laws by making false and misleading
claims about the efficacy and safety of ozone-generating Alpine purifiers. Recommendations to avoid the use of
ozone generating devices in inhabited spaces due to health-related concerns have been issued by several states,
including North Carolina, Minnesota, Florida and California.
The most effective way to avoid indoor air pollution problems is to remove the
sources of pollution or prevent emissions from occurring. For many people, the most effective way to reduce indoor
air pollution is to stop smoking. People concerned with indoor air pollution in their homes should consult a
heating, ventilation and air conditioning professional.
References:
1. American Lung Association, 1997. Residential air cleaning devices:
types, effectiveness, and health impact. 52 p.
2. Consumer Reports, 1992 (October). Household air cleaners. p. 657-662.
3. Boeniger MF, 1995. Use of ozone generating devices to improve indoor air quality.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 56:590-598.
4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1995. Ozone generators in indoor air
settings. U.S. EPA Report, EPA-600/R-95-154 (NTIS PB96-100201).
(Submitted by Lori Feyk, Ph.D., Environmental Health Program, Section of
Epidemiology.)
|